Papers Reviewing

Papers Reviewing:

1- The research is initially reviewed by the members of the editorial board to decide whether it complies with the publishing rules or if it is eligible to be sent for reviewing. The editor-in-chief may reject it either because it is not related with the journal’s specialization, or because it does not comply with the rules of scholarly publishing.

2- All research papers submitted to the Journal of Humanities and Educational Sciences before publication are subject to the reviewing process via the website or via the journal's email electronically and confidentially to determine the validity for publication.

3- The research is sent to two expert reviewers in the same specialization in a confidential manner. In case, one of the reviewers rejects the research and the other accepts the research after modification, the research is sent to a third reviewer to decide whether to be published after modification or to be rejected.

4- The research is evaluated according to the attached evaluation form. The reviewing period is stated in the form in which it does not exceed two weeks only, and if it is delayed, the research is sent to another reviewer.

5- The reviewer is requested to fill out the evaluation form, and the required amendments to the text of the research. Moreover, writing a detailed report on the research in the points that were not mentioned in the evaluation form, and is sent to the editor-in-chief. Then it is sent to the researcher to make the required corrections.

6- The researcher is requested to quickly make the required corrections and send them back to the journal within a maximum period of three weeks, with a table showing the corrections he has made.

7- The corrections made by the researcher are sent to the evaluation committee to consider the case of the researcher's commitment to modify the required corrections. Then the researcher is given a letter of acceptance of publication, and the date of publication, issue, month and year of publication mentioned in it.

8- In the case that the reviewers reject the research for publication, a letter of apology will be sent from the editor-in-chief of the journal to the researcher for rejecting the research with the reasons of rejection.

9- The journal adopts a twofold and confidential reviewing so that the author does not know the reviewer and vice versa.