The Difference &matching between Crimes of Abduction and Banditry in the light of the Rules of International Law and Islamic Jurisprudence

Abstract

Terroristic Abduction Crimes differ from ordinary crimes in terms of political and ideological motives and objectives. Even if there are multiple names of Abduction crimes, they aim at one goal which is to terrorize people by using violence and coercion to kidnap and detain, in order to bargain for their lives.

Of the reasons for committing of these crimes and widespread its scope, are the duplication of international standards, the politicization of criminal acts and the its delimitation to human rights concepts and non-implementation of death sentences for the killing kidnappers. To address these threats, as one of the organized crimes, the international cooperation and standardization the means of combating, including penal legislation, are required. As required by the nature of the study, to achieve the objectives of this study, the analytical descriptive approach has been used.

The study consists of two chapters; the first discussed the Abduction in the Islamic jurisprudence from the reality of the Banditry and the Abduction Yemeni law. The second addressed the Abduction in international conventions.