The Fundamentalist Rule of (TO): Does what comes after it is included in the ruling stated before it or not?

Abstract

This research aims to study an important foundational principle that has been relied upon by many scholars of Usul (principles of Islamic jurisprudence). However, these scholars have differed significantly in their interpretations and applications of the principle of "iila " (which denotes purpose or aim). Their arguments and applications varied for various reasons including Quranic and Hadith influences, linguistic considerations, and juristic interpretations. The researcher applied the analytical method, and meticulously examined this principle, elaborating on the positions of Usuli scholars regarding it, explaining their arguments and different schools of thought in utilizing "iila" in matters of purpose. The researcher presented evidence and examples from the Quran as well as hypothetical issues discussed by scholars, such as the requirements for handwashing, conditions for contracts extending to the night or the next day, and the rules concerning the divorce of a woman from one to three instances. It became evident to the researcher that the divergent opinions among Usuli scholars in interpreting "iila " after it stem from its multiple possible meanings, including spatial and temporal objectives, specificity, circumstances, inclusivity, emphasis, and more. The researcher also noted that the interpretive effect of "iila " in subsequent contexts appears consistent at face value, and that the reason for disagreement lies in the linguistic usage of words following "iila." The researcher recommended further studies on the influential parallels between prepositions and purposes, analyzing Usuli arguments based on hypothetical issues and compiling them into specific categories for easy reference, as well as presenting a specialized study on all Usuli principles related to semantic prepositions.